banner



Are We More Likely To Develop Foodborne Illness From Animal Foods Than Plant Foods?

During the by decade, fruits and vegetables have go leading vehicles of nutrient-borne illnesses. Furthermore, many plant-based foods and ingredients, not previously considered a run a risk, have been associated with food-borne disease outbreaks. Most of the pathogens that have been identified as causative agents in these illnesses or outbreaks are enteric zoonotic pathogens that are typically associated with fauna hosts. Transmission of zoonotic pathogens from animals to establish systems occurs by a diverseness of routes, but the initial contributing factor is the discharge of animate being manure into the surroundings. Using a "I Health" arroyo that focuses on animal, human, and environmental health concurrently can provide practical and constructive interventions for reducing the incidence of such outbreaks. This paper addresses this concept by providing recent food-borne disease outbreak data related to fruits and vegetables, delineating findings regarding the prevalence of pathogens in fauna manures and describing the vehicles that transmit pathogens from manure to produce fields, and discussing the merits of reducing pathogen transmission through interventions that would not adversely affect the health of the surround or animals.

Outbreaks and Illnesses Associated with Fresh Fruits and Vegetables

Food-borne illnesses have been a persistent challenge to public health and are now beingness detected with greater frequency largely because of enhanced surveillance systems that have been implemented in many countries. These enhanced surveillance systems accept during the by decade revealed that the proportion of total outbreaks attributed to produce is significant (Lynch et al., 2009) but varies with the country. For example, but 4 percent of all food-borne outbreaks reported in Australia from 2001 to 2005 were attributed to fresh produce (Kirk et al., 2008); similarly, in Canada, between 1976 and 2005, 3.7 percent of 5,745 outbreaks with a known vehicle of transmission were attributed to produce (Ravel et al., 2009). However, in dissimilarity, data from the Centers for Illness Control and Prevention (CDC) identified produce as either the first or 2nd leading vehicle in nutrient-borne disease outbreaks attributed to a single commodity inside the United States for the period 2006-2008 (Table A3-i). Furthermore, outbreak surveillance data of produce items compiled past the CDC during the catamenia 2000-2009 revealed that leafy greens were the almost common item associated with food-borne disease, followed by tomatoes and cantaloupes (Table A3-two). Moreover, attribution gamble rankings of fresh produce–associated outbreaks in the United States identified enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in leafy greens as the leading pathogen-produce vehicle combination, followed by Salmonella spp. in tomatoes, and Salmonella spp. in leafy greens (Anderson et al., 2011). Further differentiation of vehicles of produce-associated outbreaks that occurred in the U.s.a. during the period of 1998-2008 revealed that fresh-cut produce deemed for 56 percentage, 36 percentage, and 17 percent of the outbreaks attributed to leafy greens, tomatoes, and melons, respectively (Sneed, 2010).

TABLE A3-1. Food-Borne Disease Outbreaks Attributed to a Single Commodity by Leading Food Vehicles, 2006-2008.

Table A3-i

Nutrient-Borne Affliction Outbreaks Attributed to a Unmarried Commodity by Leading Food Vehicles, 2006-2008.

TABLE A3-2. Number of Outbreaks (illnesses) Reported Between 2000 and 2009 in the United States That Were Associated with Selected Fresh Produce Items as a Function of their Etiology,.

Table A3-2

Number of Outbreaks (illnesses) Reported Between 2000 and 2009 in the United States That Were Associated with Selected Fresh Produce Items as a Function of their Etiology,.

An evaluation of selected produce-associated outbreaks that occurred during the past 5 years revealed several common features (Table A3-iii). These outbreaks often were multistate or multinational in nature and reflect the large areas to which the foods are distributed. With imports accounting for near 39 percent of fresh fruits and xiv percent of fresh vegetables in 2005 (Johnson, 2012), improved sampling and pathogen testing of produce at the borders of the Us offers 1 barrier for reducing the likelihood of contaminated produce from entering the retail sector. However, better implementation both domestically and abroad of best nutrient safety practices for producing and processing fruits and vegetables would accept even more impact on reducing pathogen contamination and the likelihood of produce-borne illnesses. This approach would address a significant contributing factor associated with several contempo produce outbreaks, which is that contamination occurs on the farm where production and processing tin occur. For instance, in a multistate outbreak of listeriosis in 2011 that resulted in 34 deaths and was the most mortiferous food-borne outbreak in the Usa since 1924, iv outbreak-associated strains of Listeria monocytogenes were traced dorsum to whole cantaloupes and packing equipment on Jensen Farms in Colorado (CDC, 2011c). In another 2011 outbreak, fenugreek seeds that were likely contaminated with fecal thing led to the largest outbreak in the number of cases of hemolytic uremic syndrome (22.3 pct of 4,075 full cases) ever reported in the world (WHO, 2011).

TABLE A3-3. Selected Food-Borne Disease Outbreaks Attributed to Produce During the Period of 2006-2011.

Table A3-three

Selected Food-Borne Illness Outbreaks Attributed to Produce During the Period of 2006-2011.

Surveillance of Pathogens in Retail Produce

A number of studies have been conducted to determine the prevalence of enteric pathogens on fruits and vegetables, and the results varied with respect to the country of origin and the target pathogen. For Salmonella, there was for most adult countries a very low prevalence in cabbage, lettuce, and mixed salads, whereas higher prevalences were observed for developing countries where agricultural production and aseptic practices were of a lower level of sanitation (Tabular array A3-4). The presence of helminth and protozoan parasites in leafy greens (Table A3-5), withal, likely reflects the ability of these pathogens to resist standard chlorine-based wastewater treatments (Erickson and Ortega, 2006; Graczyk et al., 2007). The relatively depression occurrence of pathogen contagion on produce makes it inherently difficult to rank the degree of risk associated with the various sources of contagion by which enteric pathogens are transmitted from animals to plant production environments.

TABLE A3-4. Prevalence of Salmonella in Lettuce, Cabbage, and Mixed Salads Throughout the World (2001-2011).

Tabular array A3-4

Prevalence of Salmonella in Lettuce, Cabbage, and Mixed Salads Throughout the Earth (2001-2011).

TABLE A3-5. Prevalence of Helminth and Protozoan Parasites in Leafy Greens from 2005-2010.

Table A3-5

Prevalence of Helminth and Protozoan Parasites in Leafy Greens from 2005-2010.

Pathogens in Manures from Domesticated Creature

A large number of zoonotic pathogens reside and abound in the gastrointestinal tract of domesticated animals (poultry, cattle, swine, sheep, and goats) and are shed in their feces asymptomatically, often in very large numbers. Those enteric pathogens associated with the largest number of food-borne affliction outbreaks and illnesses include Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., Shiga toxin–producing enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (STEC), and Cryptosporidium parvum. Many studies have been conducted to decide the prevalence of these pathogens in the feces of domesticated animals. A selection of results of recent studies are shown in Tables A3-vi to A3-nine to illustrate the range of pathogen prevalences and cell numbers that may occur within animal wastes and between and inside different groups of animals. For Cryptosporidium, not all species are pathogenic for humans. For example, currently there are at least 16 recognized species of Cryptosporidium, of which two almost bear upon humans, C. hominis and C. parvum (Jagai et al., 2010). Therefore, when results practise non differentiate species of Cryptosporidium, the potential chance of those manures to human wellness may exist overestimated.

TABLE A3-6. Prevalence and Cell Numbers of Salmonella spp. in Manures from Domesticated Animals.

Table A3-6

Prevalence and Cell Numbers of Salmonella spp. in Manures from Domesticated Animals.

TABLE A3-7. Prevalence and Cell Numbers of Campylobacter spp. in Manures from Domesticated Animals.

TABLE A3-vii

Prevalence and Prison cell Numbers of Campylobacter spp. in Manures from Domesticated Animals.

TABLE A3-8. Prevalence and Cell Numbers of Shiga Toxin–Producing E. coli in Manures from Domesticated Animals.

TABLE A3-8

Prevalence and Cell Numbers of Shiga Toxin–Producing E. coli in Manures from Domesticated Animals.

TABLE A3-9. Prevalence and Cell Numbers of Cryptosporidium spp. in Manures from Domesticated Animals.

Table A3-nine

Prevalence and Cell Numbers of Cryptosporidium spp. in Manures from Domesticated Animals.

Direction of Wastes from Domesticated Animals

Globally, nutrient animal product has increased more fivefold in the past 50 years due in big office to the adoption of the industrialized concentrated animal production model. With multinational companies expanding their operations overseas, estimates indicate that concentrated beast feeding operations (CAFOs) provide 74 pct of poultry, l percent of pork, and 43 percent of beef produced worldwide (Halweil and Nierenberg, 2004). Accompanying this expansion in product has been the challenge of managing the massive quantities of animal wastes that are generated in one location. For example, in Red china, brute waste was estimated to be iii.2 billion tons, which was 3 times the amount of industrial solid waste produced in that aforementioned year (Wang et al., 2005). Inside the United States, it has besides been reported that bars food animals produce approximately 335 million dry tons of waste matter per year, which is more than forty times the amount of human biosolids waste generated from wastewater treatment plants (Graham and Nachman, 2010). The vast bulk of this animal waste matter is practical to land without whatever required treatment for reduction of pathogens as is required for man biosolids (EPA, 2004).

At that place are two primary forms of animal wastes generated at CAFOs. In the case of broiler units, solid waste material is generated either every bit single-use, partial reuse, or multiuse litter (Bolan et al., 2010). In bars swine and cattle operations, h2o is used to flush waste matter from the floors where the animals are housed, and the liquid slurry is channeled into large ponds for storage (Graham and Nachman, 2010). The application of animal wastes to country is largely based on agronomic requirements, geography, and commodity choices. For example, corn receives more than half of the land-practical manure, of which most of the manure is from dairy and hog stock because of the use of corn as a major feed ingather for dairy and hog operations and the high growth nutrient requirement of corn for nitrogen-rich manure. Hay and grasses are the second largest of the crops fertilized by manure, which is mostly from hog, broiler, and dairy producers (MacDonald et al., 2009). Poultry litter, on the other hand, is frequently used equally a fertilizer for cotton wool, peanuts, and fresh produce (Boyhan and Hill, 2008).

Straight Transmission of Enteric Pathogens from Beast Wastes to Produce Fields

Animal manures practical to fields to be used for fruit and vegetable production take the potential to be a directly source of enteric pathogens if there has not been sufficient belongings time between planting and harvest. The U.S. Department of Agronomics (USDA) National Organic Program permits the incorporation of raw manure into soil 120 days before harvest if the food ingather has directly contact with the soil; however, simply xc days prior to harvest is required if crops accept no contact with the soil (7 Lawmaking of Federal Regulations [CFR] 205.203). In contrast, more stringent requirements have been set by the Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement in which 1 yr between application of raw manure and harvest of the ingather is advocated (LGMA, 2012). As part of the Nutrient Rubber Modernization Act, it is anticipated that the Food and Drug Administration will include in its produce dominion a required fourth dimension interval between manure application to fields and either the planting or harvest of crops that would be consumed raw.

Transmission via Runoff of Enteric Pathogens from Animal Waste matter–Practical Lands to Produce Fields

I of the routes by which enteric pathogens may be indirectly transferred to produce fields from domesticated animal waste deposited or stored on country adjacent to produce fields is via storm runoff. Many studies have revealed that enteric pathogens tin move both horizontally and vertically to contaminate land, surface waters, and ground waters adjacent to produce fields (Cooley et al., 2007; Forslund et al., 2011). In these situations, the risk of pathogen contamination of produce will be dependent on a number of factors, including the attachment strength of the pathogen to soil particles, the interval betwixt the manure application and the atmospheric precipitation events, the kinetic energy of the rainfall, the topographical slope that affects the direction and velocity of water catamenia, and the density of vegetation between the waste source and the destination site (Ferguson et al., 2007; Hodgon et al., 2009; Jamieson et al., 2002; Lewis et al., 2010; Mishra et al., 2008; Saini et al., 2003; Tyrrel and Quinton, 2003). In improver, the physical state of the waste volition also affect the direction of movement of the pathogens with greater percolation occurring past a liquid slurry source and greater overland send for a solid manure source (Forslund et al., 2011; Semenov et al., 2009).

Transmission of Enteric Pathogens from Waste product-Contaminated Water Sources to Produce Fields

Storm runoff conveying pathogens from animal wastes does not necessarily have to pass through agricultural produce fields to be a source of contamination. Drove in surface waters and subsequent utilize of that water to irrigate produce crops is another ways to disseminate the pathogens. Surveys of environmental water sources for pathogen contagion accept revealed significant contamination with Salmonella spp., STEC, and protozoan parasites (Table A3-10); however, contamination appears to be sporadic and is often associated with recent rain events and seasonality (Gaertner et al., 2009; Haley et al., 2009). Enhanced survival of pathogens in the sediment (Chandran et al., 2011; Garzio-Hadzick et al., 2010) and resuspension of the organisms into the water cavalcade may also perpetuate the risk. Contagion of surface waters, moreover, has been associated with the concentration of food animals raised in the area (Cooley et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 2003; Tserendorj et al., 2011; Wilkes et al., 2011). Salmonella and Cryptosporidium contamination of watersheds not impacted by man or domesticated beast production has been observed (Edge et al., 2012; Patchanee et al., 2010), which suggests that there is a level of natural occurrence of these pathogens from wildlife sources.

TABLE A3-10. Prevalence of Salmonella spp., STEC, and Protozoan Parasites in Environmental Waters.

TABLE A3-10

Prevalence of Salmonella spp., STEC, and Protozoan Parasites in Ecology Waters.

Several epidemiological studies lend support to the role that contaminated irrigation water serves as a manual vehicle of enteric pathogens to fresh produce. In 2002 and 2005, ii outbreaks of South. Newport infection in the United states of america were associated with eating tomatoes and the outbreak strain was isolated from the pond h2o used to irrigate the love apple fields (Greene et al., 2008). Irrigation of fields with contaminated irrigation waters was as well indicated equally a possible source of contamination of imported cantaloupe associated with an outbreak of S. Poona infection in the U.s.a. in consecutive years during 2000-2002 (CDC, 2002). Given the often sporadic nature of contagion of irrigation water, these documented cases linking irrigation water to an outbreak may represent only a pocket-size fraction of the contamination events that actually occur. Worldwide, information technology is estimated that 17 percent of the globe's cropland (one.four billion hectares) is irrigated and, of that, 20 million hectares are irrigated with untreated wastewater (Jimenez et al., 2010). In the United States and the Britain, all-encompassing irrigation of fresh produce crops occurs and, of the acreage irrigated, 48 percent and 78 percent, respectively, are derived from non-groundwater sources (Knox et al., 2011; USDA NASS, 2009), which are subject to intermittent inputs of pathogens from brute husbandry operations.

Contribution of Bioaerosols to Dissemination of Enteric Pathogens from Animal Production Operations to Produce Fields

Aerosolization of microbial pathogens is an inevitable consequence associated with brute production operations as well as the handling and disposition of creature manure. However, estimating the impact of bioaerosol dispersal on pathogen dissemination has been hampered by the notable absence of standardized and validated methods for enumeration of diverse types of microorganisms in outdoor bioaerosols. Hence, there has been a broad range of prevalence and cell number values reported across very diverse types of animal operations and landscapes (Millner, 2009).

Studies addressing bioaerosol levels in outdoor air generally address fecal indicator organisms because they are more arable and easily identified in the aerosols, although it is acknowledged that they may behave differently than the pathogens. The general trend that has been observed is decreasing airborne microorganism concentrations as the distance from the source increases with relative humidity, temperature, and solar irradiance being major factors affecting viability (Dungan, 2010). Other pertinent observations fabricated in studies addressing the levels of the indicator organism, E. coli, in aerosols of poultry houses are that the levels of airborne bacteria are intricately linked to the levels of those bacteria in the litter (Chinivasagam et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2012) and the blazon of ventilation system affects the distance that E. coli is disseminated, with Eastward. coli traversing 11.i and 7.v m downwind from houses using tunnel and conventional fans, respectively (Smith et al., 2012).

Limited studies have been conducted addressing bioaerosol transport post-obit land awarding of animal manures in dissimilarity to those addressing the application of municipal wastes (Pillai and Ricke, 2002). Although at that place may be some like behavior between these two sources, in that location could be differences given that they vary in their organic affair content that can provide differences in the caste of protection against ultraviolet radiation and drying (Dungan, 2010). In ane of the few studies addressing land application of cattle and swine slurry and the method used to disperse the wastes, total bacterial counts in the air were greater at greater distances from spray guns that discharged the slurry upward into the air compared to tank spreading that sprayed the slurries closer to the footing (Boutin et al., 1988). In another study in which swine manure was applied through a center pivot irrigation system, coliform concentrations decreased to about background concentrations at 23 g downwind (Kim et al., 2008). Wind speed and topography, however, are likely to also factor into the distances traversed by pathogens and, hence, condom distances between produce fields and creature product activities volition likely be site specific.

Wild animals as a Vehicle to Transmit Pathogens from Domesticated Animal Waste product to Produce Fields

The recent focus on wildlife every bit a potential source of pathogen contagion of produce fields was driven past the isolation of E. coli O157:H7 from feral swine that occupied areas near spinach fields and cattle farms in California following the 2006 spinach outbreak (Jay et al., 2007). More recently, Campylobacter jejuni was isolated both from Sandhill crane feces and raw peas and several of the isolates had pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns duplicate from clinical samples obtained during a C. jejuni gastroenteritis outbreak that occurred in Alaska in 2008 (Gardner et al., 2011). Attention was again focused on wild animals as a potential source of contagion when E. coli O157:H7 isolated from deer feces was adamant to have an identical PFGE blueprint every bit the isolates responsible for 15 people who were ill from eating contaminated fresh strawberries in Oregon in 2011 (IEH Laboratories & Consulting Grouping, 2011). Given that the same strain was as well isolated from soil raises the question as to whether the deer were really the source of the outbreak or were infected when they ate the contaminated strawberries. Virtually evidence indicating that wildlife is a potential source of nutrient-borne contamination is from the isolation of clinically relevant pathogens from the creature's carrion. In 1 instance, Renter et al. (2006) isolated from deer fecal samples four Salmonella serovars (Litchfield, Dessau, Infantis, and Enteritidis) known to exist pathogenic to humans and animals. In some other case, subtyping of STEC isolates from wildlife meat in Federal republic of germany identified virulence genes associated with severe clinical effect (stx2, stxsecond, and eae) in 46 of the 140 STEC samples (Miko et al., 2009). More than definitive proof that specific types of wildlife could be transmission vectors of pathogens from domesticated animal facilities was obtained with a report of European starlings (Williams et al., 2011). In that study, distinct molecular types of E. coli O157:H7 were similar in starlings and cattle on different farms, and these birds were capable of shedding the pathogen in their feces for more 3 days (Kauffman and LeJeune, 2011). Hence, it is reasonable to assume that European starlings could serve equally a vector of pathogens from cattle and dairy farms to produce fields.

In response to the express studies linking wild animals to produce contamination, processors and buyers accept become overreactive in many cases in requiring the absence of many types of wild animals from farms. To illustrate this trend, the percentage of growers that reported being told past their processors or buyers that feral pigs, deer, birds, rodents, and amphibians were a meaning risk was nineteen, 28, 44, 47, and 28 pct, respectively (Lowell et al., 2010). Several studies, however, take revealed that some groups of animals have a very low prevalence of contamination with relevant human being enteric pathogens (Tabular array A3-11). It is likely that all creature groups accept the potential to be contaminated with a food-borne pathogen, just whether they are significant harbingers of human enteric pathogens is probable dependent on their admission to animal husbandry sites besides as on their social behavior (i.e., beingness of a social group and its size). This would also be the case with insects. For example, filth flies collected in leafy greenish fields were believed to have originated from nearby rangelands that contained fresh cattle manure (Talley et al., 2009).

TABLE A3-11. Prevalence of Enteric Food-Borne Pathogens in Wildlife and Insects.

TABLE A3-11

Prevalence of Enteric Food-Borne Pathogens in Wildlife and Insects.

Persistence of Pathogens on Produce in Fields Requires a Systems Approach to Foreclose and Monitor Pathogen Introduction

Many field studies have revealed the persistence of man enteric pathogens, albeit typically at low levels, in a number of dissimilar vegetables contaminated at various points during their tillage (Erickson et al., 2010; Gutiérrez-Rodriguez et al., 2011; Islam et al., 2004a, 2004b, 2004c, 2005; Moyne et al., 2011). This is noteworthy because chemical disinfectants typically used during minimal processing of fresh produce are not fully effective in eliminating pathogen contamination (Doyle and Erickson, 2008). Hence, it is paramount to prevent the introduction of these pathogens into produce fields. The main approach currently used to reduce the risk of pathogen contamination in fields is the awarding of practiced agricultural practices (GAPs). To prevent the introduction of pathogens through nontraditional vehicles (storm runoff, intrusions past pathogen-carrying wildlife) will require the evolution of novel approaches in addition to GAPs. Given that the environment surrounding the produce field would probable be impacted by these pathogen command practices, it is important to implement a systems approach and consider all ramifications to the adoption of whatever intervention practices. Information technology is also of import to be cognizant that tempest runoff and fecal deposits from wild fauna may only contaminate the plants at detached locations within a field. The ability to detect this contamination by current sampling plans that rely on uniform contagion is therefore limited and efforts are needed to develop new monitoring systems that tin observe contamination when such pathogen introductions occur.

Concluding Comments

Vegetables, fruits, and a variety of plant foods and ingredients are now recognized as major vehicles of food-borne disease outbreaks, and a primary source of pathogen contagion of this commodity grouping is animal manure. At that place are several routes past which pathogens tin can be transmitted from fauna production sites to produce fields. The vehicles likely presenting the greatest risk are manure-contaminated soil amendments and irrigation h2o. Wildlife, insects, and vermin, however, may as well serve as intermediate vectors of pathogens from fauna wastes to plants in the field. The multifaceted routes by which pathogens may be transmitted to produce crops illuminates the value of a I Health approach to minimize pathogen contagion in the production environment while ensuring that adverse effects to the environment be minimized.

References

  • Abadias M, Usall J, Anguera M, Solsona C, Viñas I. Microbiological quality of fresh, minimally-processed fruit and vegetables, and sprouts from retail establishments. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2008;123:121–129. [PubMed: 18237811]

  • Abougrain AK, Nahaisi MH, Madi NS, Saied MM, Ghenghesh KS. Parasitological contamination in salad vegetables in Tripoli-Libya. Nutrient Control. 2010;21:760–762.

  • Ahmed W, Sawant Due south, Huygens F, Goonetilleke A, Gardner T. Prevalence and occurrence of zoonotic bacterial pathogens in surface waters determined by quantitative PCR. Water Enquiry. 2009;43:4918–4928. [PubMed: 19631959]

  • Alam MJ, Zurek Fifty. Association of Escherichia coli O157:H7 with houseflies on a cattle farm. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2004;70:7578–7580. [PMC free commodity: PMC535191] [PubMed: 15574966]

  • Alam MJ, Zurek 50. Seasonal prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in beef cattle feces. Journal of Food Protection. 2006;69:3018–3020. [PubMed: 17186673]

  • Amoah P, Drechsel P, Abaidoo RC, Ntow WJ. Pesticide and pathogen contamination of vegetables in Republic of ghana'south urban markets. Archives of Ecology Contamination and Toxicology. 2006;50:ane–6. [PubMed: 16328619]

  • Amorós I, Alonso JL, Cuesta K. Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts on salad products irrigated with contaminated h2o. Journal of Food Protection. 2010;73:1138–1140. [PubMed: 20537274]

  • Anderson M, Jaykus LA, Beaulieu S, Dennis Due south. Pathogen-produce pair attribution chance ranking tool to prioritize fresh produce commodity and pathogen combinations for further evaluation (PthreeARRT). Food Control. 2011;22:1865–1872.

  • Arthur L, Jones South, Fabri M, Odumeru J. Microbial survey of selected Ontario-grown fresh fruits and vegetables. Periodical of Nutrient Protection. 2007;70:2864–2867. [PubMed: 18095445]

  • Berg J, McAllister T, Bach S, Stilborn R, Hancock D, LeJeune J. Escherichia coli O157:H7 excretion by commercial feedlot cattle fed either barley- or corn-based finishing diets. Journal of Nutrient Protection. 2004;67:666–671. [PubMed: 15083716]

  • Bolan NS, Szogi AA, Chuasavathi T, Seshadri B, Rothrock MJ Jr., Panneerselvam P. Uses and management of poultry litter. World's Poultry Scientific discipline Periodical. 2010;66:673–698.

  • Bornay-Llinares FJ, Navarro-i-Martínez L, García-Orenes F, Araez H, Pérez-Murcia MD, Moral R. Detection of abdominal parasites in grunter slurry: A preliminary study from five farms in Kingdom of spain. Livestock Science. 2006;102:237–242.

  • Boutin P, Torre M, Serceau R, Rideau PJ. Atmospheric bacterial contamination from landspreading of animal wastes: Evaluation of the respiratory run a risk for people nearby. Journal of Agronomical Applied science Research. 1988;39:149–160.

  • Boyhan GE, Hill CR. Organic fertility sources for the brusque-mean solar day organic onion transplants. HortTechnology. 2008;18:227–231.

  • Briones V, Téllez S, Goyache J, Ballesteros C, del Pilar Lanzarot M, Domínguez L, Fernández-Garayzábal JF. Salmonella diverseness associated with wild reptiles and amphibians in Spain. Ecology Microbiology. 2004;6:868–871. [PubMed: 15250889]

  • Callaway TR, Anderson RC, Tellez Thou, Rosario C, Nava GM, Eslava C, Blanco MA, Quiroz MA, Olguín A, Herradora M, Edrington TS, Genovese KJ, Harvey RB, Nisbet DJ. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle and swine in Central United mexican states. Journal of Food Protection. 2004;67:2274–2276. [PubMed: 15508641]

  • Castañeda-Ramírez C, Cortes-Rodríguez V, de la Fuente-Salcido North, Bideshi DK, Cristina M, del Rincón-Castro MC, Barboza-Corona JE. Isolation of Salmonella spp. from lettuce and evaluation of its susceptibility to novel bacteriocins of Bacillus thuringiensis and antibiotics. Journal of Food Protection. 2011;74:274–278. [PubMed: 21333148]

  • CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Multistate outbreaks of Salmonella serotype Poona infections associated with eating cantaloupe from Mexico—United states of america and Canada, 2000-2002. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Study. 2002;51(46):1044–1047. [PubMed: 12487526]

  • CDC (Centers for Affliction Control and Prevention). Botulism associated with commercial carrot juice—Georgia and Florida, September 2006. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Study. 2006. [Jan 8, 2011]. pp. 1098–1099. http://world wide web​.cdc.gov/mmwr​/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5540a5.htm. [PubMed: 17035929]

  • CDC (Centers for Illness Control and Prevention). Investigation of outbreak of infections caused past Salmonella Litchfield. 2008. [January 6, 2011]. http://www​.cdc.gov/salmonella​/litchfield/

  • CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Outbreak of Salmonella serotype Saintpaul infections associated with multiple raw produce items—United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2008. [January 6, 2011]. pp. 929–934. http://www​.cdc.gov/mmwr​/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5734a1.htm. [PubMed: 18756191]

  • CDC (Centers for Disease Command and Prevention). Outbreak of Salmonella serotype Saintpaul infections associated with eating alfalfa sprouts—U.s.a., 2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2009;58:500–503. [PubMed: 19444155]

  • CDC (Centers for Illness Command and Prevention). Investigation update: Multistate outbreak of human Salmonella Newport infections linked to raw alfalfa sprouts. 2010. [Jan 6, 2011]. http://www​.cdc.gov/salmonella​/newport/alphabetize.html.

  • CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Investigation update: Multistate outbreak of human East. coli O145 infections linked to shredded romaine lettuce from a single processing facility (final update). 2010. [July 21, 2011]. http://www​.cdc.gov/ecoli​/2010/ecoli_o145/index.html.

  • CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Investigation of a multistate outbreak of homo Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- infections linked to alfalfa sprouts. 2011. [January 6, 2011]. (January half dozen, 2011 written report). http://www​.cdc.gov/salmonella​/i4512i-/010611/alphabetize.html.

  • Chandran A, Varghese S, Kandeler E, Thomas A, Hatha M, Mazumder A. An cess of potential public health risk associated with the extended survival of indicator and pathogenic bacteria in freshwater lake sediments. International Periodical of Hygiene and Environmental Wellness. 2011;214:258–264. [PubMed: 21316302]

  • Chen Z, Mi R, Yu H, Shi Y, Huang Y, Chen Y, Zhou P, Cai Y, Lin J. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in pigs in Shanghai, Communist china. Veterinary Parasitology. 2011;181:113–119. [PubMed: 21616599]

  • Chinivasagam HN, Tran T, Maddock L, Gale A, Blackall PJ. Mechically ventilated broiler sheds: A possible source of aerosolized Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli. Practical and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75:7417–7425. [PMC free article: PMC2786424] [PubMed: 19801461]

  • Cho S, Diez-Gonzalez F, Fossler CP, Wells SJ, Hedberg CW, Kaneene JB, Ruegg PL, Warnick LD, Bender JB. Prevalence of shiga toxin-encoding Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms and county fairs. Veterinary Microbiology. 2006;118:289–298. [PubMed: 16959442]

  • Čížek A, Alexa P, Literák I, Hamřík J, Novák P, Smola J. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 in feedlot cattle and Norwegian rats from a large-calibration farm. Messages in Applied Microbiology. 1999;28:435–439. [PubMed: 10389259]

  • Colles FM, Ali JS, Sheppard SK, McCarthy ND, Maiden MCJ. Campylobacter populations in wild and domesticated Mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Environmental Microbiology Reports. 2011;3:574–580. [PMC free article: PMC3229703] [PubMed: 22164198]

  • Cooley M, Carychao D, Crawford-Miksza L, Jay MT, Myers C, Rose C, Keys C, Farrar J, Mandrell RE. Incidence and tracking of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a major produce production region in California. PLoS Ane. 2007;11:E1159. [PMC free article: PMC2174234] [PubMed: 18174909]

  • Cox P, Griffith Chiliad, Angles M, Deere D, Ferguson C. Concentrations of pathogens and indicators in animal carrion in the Sydney watershed. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:5929–5934. [PMC gratis commodity: PMC1265995] [PubMed: 16204506]

  • De Giusti M, Aurigemma C, Marinelli Fifty, Tufi D, De Medici D, Di Pasquale S, De Vito C. The evaluation of the microbial rubber of fresh ready-to-swallow vegetables produced by different technologies in Italy. Journal of Practical Microbiology. 2010;109:996–1006. [PubMed: 20408920]

  • Doane CA, Pangloli P, Richards HA, Mountain JR, Golden DA, Draughon FA. Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in various farm environments. Journal of Nutrient Protection. 2007;seventy:6–x. [PubMed: 17265852]

  • Doyle MP, Erickson MC. The problems with fresh produce: An overview. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2008;105:313–330. [PubMed: 18284485]

  • Droppo IG, Liss SN, Williams D, Nelson T, Jaskot C, Trapp B. Dynamic existence of waterborne pathogens within river sediment compartments. Implications for h2o quality regulatory affairs. Environmental Science & Technology. 2009;43:1737–1743. [PubMed: 19368165]

  • Dungan RS. Fate and transport of bioaerosols associated with livestock operations and manures. Journal of Animal Science. 2010;88:3693–3706. [PMC complimentary article: PMC7109640] [PubMed: 20622180]

  • Dunn JR, Keen JE, Del Vecchio R, Wittum TE, Alex Thompson R. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a cohort of weaned, preconditioned range beef calves. Journal of Food Protection. 2004;67:2391–2396. [PubMed: 15553618]

  • Edge TA, El-Shaarawi A, Gannon V, Jokinen C, Kent R, Khan IUH, Koning W, Lapen D, Miller J, Neumann Due north, Phillips R, Robertson W, Schreier H, Scott A, Shtepani I, Topp East, Wilkes G, van Bochove E. Investigation of an Escherichia coli environmental benchmark for waterborne pathogens in agricultural watersheds in Canada. Journal of Ecology Quality. 2012;41:21–30. [PubMed: 22218170]

  • Edrington TS, Callaway TR, Hallford DM, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ. Influence of exogenous triiodothyronine (T3) on fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle. Microbial Environmental. 2007;53:664–663. [PubMed: 17394043]

  • EFSA (European Nutrient Safe Authority). Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) O104:H4 2011 outbreaks in Europe: Taking stock. EFSA Journal. 2011;9:2390.

  • Eleftheriadou Chiliad, Varnava-Tello A, Metta-Loizidou M, Nikolaou AS, Akkelidou D. The microbiological profile of foods in the Republic of Cyprus: 1991-2000. Food Microbiology. 2002;nineteen:463–471.

  • Elviss NC, Petty CL, Hucklesby L, Sagoo South, Surman-Lee S, de Pinna E, Threlfall EJ. Microbiological report of fresh herbs from retail premises uncovers an international outbreak of salmonellosis. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2009;134:83–88. [PubMed: 19237218]

  • Emberland KE, Ethelberg South, Kuusi M, Vold 50, Jensvoll L, Lindstedt BA, Nygård K, Kjelsø C, Sørensen G, Jensen T, Lukinmaa South, Niskanen T, Kapperud 1000. Outbreak of Salmonella Weltevreden infections in Norway, Denmark and Finland associated with alfalfa sprouts, July–October 2007. Eurosurveillance. 2007;12(48) [January 6, 2011]; Article four. http://www​.eurosurveillance​.org/ViewArticle​.aspx?ArticleId=3321. [PubMed: 18053569]

  • EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Bureau). Managing manure nutrients at concentrated creature feeding operations. Washington, DC: 2004. [March xi, 2012]. http://tammi​.tamu.edu​/final-manure-guidance.pdf.

  • Erickson MC, Ortega Year. Inactivation of parasites in food, water, and ecology systems. Periodical of Food Protection. 2006;69:2786–2808. [PubMed: 17133829]

  • Erickson MC, Webb CC, Diaz-Perez JC, Phatak SC, Silvoy JJ, Davey LE, Payton AS, Liao J, Ma L, Doyle MP. Surface and internalized Escherichia coli O157:H7 on field-grown spinach and lettuce treated with spray-contaminated irrigation water. Journal of Food Protection. 2010;73:1023–1029. [PubMed: 20537256]

  • Erdođrul Ö, Şener H. The contamination of various fruits and vegetable with Enterobius vermicularis, Ascaris eggs, Entamoeba histolyca cysts and Giardia cysts. Food Control. 2005;16:559–562.

  • Ethelberg S, Lisby M, Böttiger B, Schultz AC, Villif A, Jensen T, Olsen KE, Scheutz F, Kjelsø C, Müller L. Outbreaks of gastroenteritis linked to lettuce, Denmark, Jan 2010. Eurosurveillance. 2010;15(6) [Jan half-dozen, 2011]; Article 1. http://www​.eurosurveillance​.org/ViewArticle​.aspx?ArticleId=19484. [PubMed: 20158982]

  • Farzan A, Parrington 50, Coklin T, Cook A, Pintar Grand, Pollari F, Friendship R, Farber J, Dixon B. Detection and characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. on swine farms in Ontario, Canada. Foodborne Pathogens and Illness. 2011;viii:1207–1213. [PubMed: 21675863]

  • Ferguson CM, Davies CM, Kaucner C, Krogh M, Rodehutskors J, Deere DA, Ashbolt NJ. Field scale quantification of microbial send from bovine feces under simulated rainfall events. Journal of Water and Health. 2007;5:83–95. [PubMed: 17402281]

  • Forslund A, Markussen B, Toenner-Klank Fifty, Bech TB, Jacobsen Bone, Dalsgaard A. Leaching of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts, Escherichia coli, and a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium bacteriophage through intact soil cores following surface awarding and injection of slurry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2011;77:8129–8138. [PMC free commodity: PMC3208979] [PubMed: 21948848]

  • Friesema I, Sigmundsdottir G, van der Zwaluw Thou, Heuvelink A, Schimmer B, de Jager C, Rump B, Briem H, Hardardottir H, Atladottir A, Gudmundsdottir E, van Pelt W. An international outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 infection due to lettuce, September–October 2007. Eurosurveillance. 2007;13:50. [January 6, 2011]; http://world wide web​.eurosurveillance​.org/ViewArticle​.aspx?ArticleId=19065. [PubMed: 19087865]

  • Fröder H, Martins CG, Oliveira de Souza KL, Landgraf M, Franco BDGM, Destro MT. Minimally processed vegetable salads: Microbial quality evaluation. Journal of Food Protection. 2007;seventy:1277–1280. [PubMed: 17536694]

  • Gaertner JP, Garres T, Becker JC, Jimenez ML, Forstner MRJ, Hahn D. Temporal analyses of Salmonellae in a headwater bound ecosystem reveals the effects of precipitation and runoff events. Periodical of H2o and Health. 2009;seven:115–121. [PubMed: 18957780]

  • Gardner TJ, Fitzgerald C, Xavier C, Klein R, Pruckler J, Stroika Southward, McLaughlin JB. Outbreak of campylobacteriosis associated with consumption of raw peas. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2011;53:16–21. [PubMed: 21653299]

  • Garzio-Hadzick A, Shelton DR, Hill RL, Pachepsky YA, Guber AK, Rowland R. Survival of manure-borne Eastward. coli in streambed sediment: Effects of temperature and sediment backdrop. Water Research. 2010;44:2753–2762. [PubMed: 20219232]

  • Gorski L, Parker CT, Liang A, Cooley MB, Jay-Russell TM, Gordus AG, Atwill ER, Mandrell RE. Prevalence, distribution, and diverseness of Salmonella enterica in a major produce region of California. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2011;77:2734–2748. [PMC free commodity: PMC3126348] [PubMed: 21378057]

  • Graczyk TK, Lucy FE, Tamang L, Miraflor A. Human enteropathogen load in activated sewage sludge and corresponding sewage sludge finish products. Applied and Ecology Microbiology. 2007;73:2013–2015. [PMC gratis commodity: PMC1828822] [PubMed: 17277215]

  • Graham JP, Nachman KE. Managing waste product from bars animal feeding operations in the United states: The need for sanitary reform. Journal of Water and Health. 2010;viii:646–670. [PubMed: 20705978]

  • Greene SK, Daly ER, Talbot EA, Demma LJ, Holzbauer S, Patel NJ, Hill TA, Walderhaug MO, Hoekstra RM, Lynch MF, Painter JA. Recurrent multistate outbreak of Salmonella Newport associated with tomatoes from contaminated fields, 2005. Epidemiology & Infection. 2008;136:157–165. [PMC gratis article: PMC2870807] [PubMed: 17475091]

  • Gunn GJ, McKendrick IJ, Ternent HE, Thomson-Carter F, Foster Grand, Synge BA. An investigation of factors associated with the prevalence of verocytotoxin producing Escherichia coli O157 shedding in Scottish beef cattle. The Veterinary Journal. 2007;174:554–564. [PubMed: 17977035]

  • Gutiérrez-Rodriguez Due east, Gundersen A, Sbodio AO, Suslow Tv. Variable agronomic practices, cultivar, strain source, and initial contamination dose differentially affect survival of Escherichia coli on spinach. Periodical of Applied Microbiology. 2011;112:109–118. [PubMed: 22040351]

  • Haley BJ, Cole D, Lipp EK. Distribution, diversity and seasonality of water-borne Salmonella in a rural watershed. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75:1248–1255. [PMC free article: PMC2648171] [PubMed: 19124594]

  • Halweil B, Nierenberg D. Watching what we eat. Washington, DC: The Worldwatch Institute; 2004. Land of the earth 2004: Special focus: The consumer society.

  • Hancock DD, Besser TE, Rice DH, Ebel ED, Herriott DE, Carpenter LV. Multiple sources of Escherichia coli O157 in feedlots and dairy farms in the northwestern Us. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 1998;35:xi–19. [PubMed: 9638776]

  • Hansson I, Pudas N, Harborn B, Engvall EO. Within-flock variations of Campylobacter loads in caeca and on carcasses from broilers. International Periodical of Food Microbiology. 2010;141:51–55. [PubMed: 20493571]

  • Harwood VJ, Levine Advertizing, Scott TM, Chivukula V, Lukasik J, Farrah SR, Rose JB. Validity of the indicator organism paradigm for pathogen reduction in reclaimed h2o and public health protection. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:3163–3170. [PMC complimentary article: PMC1151840] [PubMed: 15933017]

  • Henzler DJ, Opitz HM. The role of mice in the epizootiology of Salmonella enteritidis infection on chicken layer farms. Avian Diseases. 1992;36:625–631. [PubMed: 1417592]

  • Heuvelink AE, Zwarkruis JTM, Van Heerwaarden C, Arends B, Stortelder V, de Boer Eastward. Pathogenic bacteria and parasites in wildlife and surface water. Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde. 2008;133:330–335. [PubMed: 18505230]

  • Hjertqvist Grand, Johansson A, Svensson N, Aborn PE, Magnusson C, Olsson Thousand, Hedlund KO, Andersson Y. Four outbreaks of norovirus gastroenteritis later on consuming rasp-berries, Sweden, June–Baronial 2006. Eurosurveillance. 2006;11(36) [Jan half dozen, 2011]; http://www​.eurosurveillance​.org/ViewArticle​.aspx?ArticleId=3038. [PubMed: 17075140]

  • Hodgon CJ, Bulmer N, Chadwick DR, Oliver DM, Heathwaite AL, Fish RD, Winter M. Establishing relative release kinetics of faecal indicator organisms from different fecal matrices. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2009;49:124–130. [PubMed: 19422475]

  • Holt PS, Geden CJ, Moore RW, Gast RK. Isolation of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis from houseflies (Musca domestica) found in rooms containing Salmonella serovar Enteritidis-challenged hens. Applied and Ecology Microbiology. 2007;73:6030–6035. [PMC free article: PMC2075029] [PubMed: 17675422]

  • Hutchison ML, Walters LD, Avery SM, Synge BA, Moore A. Levels of zoonotic agents in British livestock manures. Letters in Practical Microbiology. 2004;39:207–214. [PubMed: 15242463]

  • Hutchison ML, Walters LD, Avery SM, Munro F, Moore A. Analyses of livestock production, waste matter storage, and pathogen levels and prevalences in farm manures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:1231–1236. [PMC free article: PMC1065162] [PubMed: 15746323]

  • IEH Laboratories & Consulting Group. IEH isolates outbreak strain of E. coli O157:H7 from deer feces at implicated Oregon strawberry subcontract. 2011. [March xiii, 2012]. http://www​.iehinc.com/article/index​.jek8_9_11.

  • Islam Thou, Doyle MP, Phatak SC, Millner P, Jiang Ten. Persistence of entero-hemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in soil and on leaf lettuce and parsley grown in fields treated with contaminated manure composts or irrigation h2o. Periodical of Food Protection. 2004;67:1365–1370. [PubMed: 15270487]

  • Islam 1000, Morgan J, Doyle MP, Phatak SC, Millner P, Jiang X. Persistence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium on lettuce and parsley and in soils on which they were grown in fields treated with contaminated manure composts or irrigation water. Foodborne Pathogens and Illness. 2004;one:27–35. [PubMed: 15992259]

  • Islam M, Morgan J, Doyle MP, Phatak SC, Millner P, Jiang X. Fate of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium on carrots and radishes grown in fields treated with contaminated manure composts or irrigation water. Applied and Ecology Microbiology. 2004;70:2497–2502. [PMC gratis article: PMC383101] [PubMed: 15066849]

  • Islam M, Doyle MP, Phatak SC, Millner P, Jiang X. Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in soil and on carrots and onions grown in fields treated with contaminated manure composts or irrigation water. Food Microbiology. 2005;22:63–70.

  • Jagai JS, Griffiths JK, Kirshen PH, Webb P, Naumova EN. Patterns of protozoan infections: Spatiotemporal associations with cattle density. EcoHealth. 2010;7:33–46. [PubMed: 20229128]

  • Jamieson RC, Gordon RJ, Sharples KE, Stratton GW, Madani A. Movement and persistence of fecal leaner in agricultural soils and subsurface drainage water: A review. Canadian Biosystems Engineering. 2002;44:ane.ane–1.9.

  • Jay MT, Cooley M, Carychao D, Wiscomb GW, Sweitzer RA, Crawford-Miksza 50, Farrar JA, Lau DK, O'Connell J, Millington A, Asmundson RV, Atwill ER, Mandrell RE. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in feral swine near spinach fields and cattle, central California coast. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2007;thirteen:1908–1911. [PMC free article: PMC2876768] [PubMed: 18258044]

  • Jenkins MB, Liotta JL, Lucio-Forster A, Bowman DD. Concentrations, viability, and distribution of Cryptosporidium genotypes in lagoons of swine facilities in the Southern Piedmont and in coastal manifestly watersheds of Georgia. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2010;76:5757–5763. [PMC free article: PMC2935074] [PubMed: 20639363]

  • Jeon BW, Jeong JM, Won GY, Park H, Eo SK, Kang HY, Hur J, Lee JH. Prevalence and characteristics of Escherichia coli O26 and O111 from cattle in Korea. International Journal of Nutrient Microbiology. 2006;110:123–126. [PubMed: 16682093]

  • Jimenez V, Drechsel P, Kone D, Bahri A, Raschid-Sally L, Qadir G. Wastewater, sludge and excreta use in developing countries: An overview. In: Drechsel C, Scott A, Raschid-Sally L, Redwood M, Bahri A, editors. Wastewater irrigation and health. London: Earthscan; 2010.

  • Jo MY, Kim JH, Lim JH, Kang MY, Koh HB, Park YH, Yoon DY, Chae JS, Eo SK, Lee JH. Prevalence and characteristics of Escherichia coli O157 from major food animals in Korea. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2004;95:41–49. [PubMed: 15240073]

  • Johnson JYM, Thomas JE, Graham TA, Townshend I, Byrne J, Sellinger LB, Gannon VPJ. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. in surface waters of southern Alberta and its relation to manure sources. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 2003;49:326–335. [PubMed: 12897826]

  • Johnston LM, Jaykus LA, Moll D, Anciso J, Mora B, Moe CL. A field study of the microbiological quality of fresh produce of domestic and Mexican origin. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2006;112:83–95. [PubMed: 17045687]

  • Kauffman Doc, LeJeune J. European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) challenged with Escherichia coli O157 can carry and transmit the human pathogen to cattle. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2011;53:596–601. [PubMed: 21985308]

  • Kijima-Tanaka Chiliad, Ishihara K, Kojima A, Morioka A, Nagata R, Kawanishi M, Nakazawa Thousand, Tamura Y, Takahashi T. A national surveillance of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in nutrient-producing animals in Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B. 2005;52:230–237. [PubMed: 16115097]

  • Kijlstra A, Meerburg B, Cornelissen J, De Craeye S, Vereijken P, Jongert E. The part of rodents and shrews in the transmission of Toxoplasma gondii to pigs. Veterinary Parasitology. 2008;156:183–190. [PubMed: 18606498]

  • Kim Thousand, Thurston JA, Hagen LJ. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to predict bioaerosol transport behavior during center pivot wastewater irrigation. Presented at the ASABE Annual International Meeting; Minneapolis, MN. 2008. Paper No. 074063.

  • Kirk MC, Fullerton K, Gregory J. 2008 International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases Program and Abstracts Book. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2008. Fresh produce outbreaks in Australia 2001-2006. Board 21; pp. 49–l.

  • Kishima M, Uchida I, Namimatsu T, Osumi T, Takahashi S, Tanaka Thou, Aoki H, Matsuura Thou, Yamamoto 1000. Nationwide surveillance of Salmonella in the faeces of pigs in Japan. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008;55:139–144. [PubMed: 18331516]

  • Klein M, Borwn Fifty, Tucker RW, Ashbolt NJ, Stuetz RM, Roser DJ. Variety and abundance of zoonotic pathogens and indicators in manures of feedlot cattle in Australia. Applied and Ecology Microbiology. 2010;76:6947–6950. [PMC free commodity: PMC2953019] [PubMed: 20802080]

  • Knox JW, Tyrrel SF, Daccache A, Weatherhead EK. A geospatial approach to assessing microbiological water quality risks associated with irrigation abstraction. Water and Environment Journal. 2011;25:282–289.

  • Kopanic RJ Jr., Sheldon BW, Wright CG. Cockroaches as vectors of Salmonella: Laboratory and field trials. Journal of Food Protection. 1994;57:125–132. [PubMed: 31113148]

  • Kozan E, Gonenc B, Sarimehmetoglu O, Aycicek H. Prevalence of helminth eggs on raw vegetables used for salads. Food Control. 2005;16:239–242.

  • Kuhnert P, Dubosson CR, Roesch M, Homfeld East, Doherr MG, Blum JW. Prevalence and risk-gene analysis of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli in faecal samples of organically and conventionally farmed dairy cattle. Veterinary Microbiology. 2005;109:37–45. [PubMed: 15964720]

  • Kullas H, Coles M, Rhyan J, Clark L. Prevalence of Escherichia coli serogroups and human virulence factors in feces of urban Canada geese (Branta canadensis). International Journal of Environmental Wellness Research. 2002;12:153–162. [PubMed: 12396532]

  • Le Bouquin Due south, Allain V, Rouxel S, Petetin I, Picherot Thousand, Michel Five, Chemaly 1000. Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonella spp. contagion in French broiler-craven flocks at the finish of the rearing menstruation. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2010;97:245–251. [PubMed: 20970209]

  • LeJeune JT, Hancock D, Wasteson Y, Skjerve Eastward, Urdahl AM. Comparison of E. coli O157 and Shiga toxin-encoding genes (stx) prevalence between Ohio, Us and Norwegian dairy cattle. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2006;109:xix–24. [PubMed: 16504323]

  • Lewis DJ, Atwill ER, Lennox MS, Pereira MDG, Miller WA, Conrad PA, Tate KW. Management of microbial contamination in storm runoff from California littoral dairy pastures. Journal of Ecology Quality. 2010;39:1782–1789. [PubMed: 21043283]

  • Lewis HC, Ethelberg South, Olsen KEP, Nielsen EM, Lisby M, Madsen SB, Boel J, Stafford R, Kirk M, Smith HV, Tikumrum South, Wisetrojana A, Bangtrakulnonth A, Vithayarungruangsri J, Siriarayaporn P, Ungchusak One thousand, Bishop J, Mølbak K. Outbreaks of Shigella sonnei infections in Denmark and Australia linked to consumption of imported raw baby corn. Epidemiology & Infection. 2009;137:326–334. [PubMed: 19134229]

  • Li X, Atwill E, Vodovoz T, Vivas E, Xiao C, Kilonzo C, Jay-Russell M, Nguyen T. Cryptosporidium spp. in wild rodent populations adjacent to produce production fields. IAFP Annual Coming together Abstracts; Madison, WI. 2011. pp. P1–119.

  • Lienemann T, Niskanen T, Guedes Southward, Siitonen A, Kuusi K, Rimhanen-Finne R. Iceberg lettuce as suggested source of a nationwide outbreak caused by two Salmonella serotypes, Newport and Reading, in Finland in 2008. Journal of Food Protection. 2011;74:1035–1040. [PubMed: 21669088]

  • Lomonaco S, Decastelli L, Bianchi DM, Nucera D, Grassi MA, Sperone Five, Civera T. Detection of Salmonella in finishing pigs on farm and at slaughter in Piedmont, Italy. Zoonoses and Public Health. 2009;56:137–144. [PubMed: 19068072]

  • Loncarevic S, Johannessen GS, Rørvik LM. Bacteriological quality of organically grown leaf lettuce in Kingdom of norway. Letters in Practical Microbiology. 2005;41:186–189. [PubMed: 16033519]

  • Lynch MF, Tauxe RV, Hedberg CW. The growing brunt of foodborne outbreaks due to contaminated fresh produce: Risks and opportunities. Epidemiology & Infection. 2009;137:307–315. [PubMed: 19200406]

  • Madden RH, Murray KA, Gilmour A. Carriage of iv bacterial pathogens by beef cattle in Northern Ireland at time of slaughter. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2007;44:115–119. [PubMed: 17257247]

  • McMahon MAS, Wilson IG. The occurrence of enteric pathogens and Aeromonas species in organic vegetables. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2001;70:155–162. [PubMed: 11759753]

  • Miko A, Pries 1000, Haby S, Steege K, Albrecht N, Krause Thou, Beutin L. Assessment of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates from wildlife meat as potential pathogens for humans. Practical and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75:6462–6470. [PMC free article: PMC2765146] [PubMed: 19700552]

  • Millner PD. Bioaerosols associated with animal product operations. Bioresource Engineering science. 2009;100:5379–5385. [PubMed: 19395257]

  • Mishra A, Benham BL, Mostaghimi Due south. Bacterial transport from agricultural lands fertilized with animal manure. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2008;189:127–134.

  • Moriarty EM, Sinton LW, Mackenzie ML, Karki N, Forest DR. A survey of enteric leaner and protozoans in fresh bovine carrion on New Zealand dairy farms. Periodical of Applied Microbiology. 2008;105:2015–2025. [PubMed: 19016977]

  • Moyne AL, Sudarshana MR, Blessington T, Koike ST, Cahn MD, Harris LJ. Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in field-inoculated lettuce. Food Microbiology. 2011;25:1417–1425. [PubMed: 21925023]

  • Mukherjee A, Speh D, Dyck E, Diez-Gonzalez F. Preharvest evaluation of coliforms, Escherichia coli O157:H7 in organic and conventional produce grown by Minnesota farmers. Journal of Food Protection. 2004;67:894–900. [PubMed: 15151224]

  • Mukherjee A, Speh D, Jones AT, Buesing KM, Diez-Gonzalez F. Longitudinal microbiological survey of fresh produce grown by farmers in the Upper Midwest. Journal of Food Protection. 2006;69:1928–1936. [PubMed: 16924919]

  • Munnoch SA, Ward 1000, Sheridan S, Fitzsimmons GJ, Shadbolt CT, Piispanen JP, Wang Q, Ward TJ, Worgan TLM, Oxenford C, Musto JA, Mcanulty J, Durrheim DN. A multistate outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul in Australia associated with cantaloupe consumption. Epidemiology & Infection. 2009;137:367–374. [PubMed: 18559128]

  • Okago CN, Uoh VJ, Galadima M. Occurrence of pathogens on vegetables harvested from soils irrigated with contaminated streams. Scientific discipline of the Total Environment. 2003;311:49–56. [PubMed: 12826382]

  • Oliveira G, Usall J, Viñas I, Anguera M, Gatius F, Abadias Thou. Microbiological quality of fresh lettuce from organic and conventional production. Food Microbiology. 2010;27:679–684. [PubMed: 20510788]

  • Olsen AR, Hammack TS. Isolation of Salmonella spp. from the housefly Musca domestica L., and the dump wing, Hydrotaea aenescens (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Muscidae) at caged-layer houses. Journal of Food Protection. 2000;63:958–960. [PubMed: 10914668]

  • Omeira N, Barbour EK, Nehme PA, Hamadeh SK, Zuray R, Bashour I. Microbiological and chemic properties of litter from different chicken types and production systems. Scientific discipline of the Total Surround. 2006;367:156–162. [PubMed: 16697440]

  • Oporto B, Esteban JI, Aduriz G, Juste RA, Hurtado A. Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in healthy cattle, sheep, and swine herds in northern Espana. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008;55:73–81. [PubMed: 18234025]

  • Patchanee P, Molla B, White Due north, Line DE, Gebreyes WA. Tracking Salmonella contamination in various watersheds and phenotypic and genotypic diversity. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2010;7:1113–1120. [PubMed: 20528467]

  • Pezzoli L, Elson R, Little CL, Yip H, Fisher I, Yishai R, Anis E, Valinsky Fifty, Biggerstaff K, Patel N, Mather H, Chocolate-brown DJ, Coia JE, van Pelt W, Nielsen EM, Ethelberg South, de Pinna E, Hampton Physician, Peters T, Threlfall J. Packed with Salmonella—investigation of an international outbreak of Salmonella Senftenberg infection linked to contamination of prepacked basil in 2007. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2008;v:661–668. [PubMed: 18851676]

  • Pillai SD, Ricke SC. Bioaerosols from municipal and animal wastes: Background and gimmicky issues. Canadian Periodical of Microbiology. 2002;48:681–696. [PubMed: 12381025]

  • Quiroz-Santiago C, Rodas-Suárez OR, Vázquez CR, Fernández FJ, Quiñones-Ramírez EI, Vázquez-Salinas C. Prevalence of Salmonella in vegetables from Mexico. Journal of Food Protection. 2009;72:1279–1282. [PubMed: 19610340]

  • Rai PK, Tripathi BD. Microbial contamination in vegetables due to irrigation with partially treated municipal wastewater in a tropical city. International Journal of Ecology Health Research. 2007;17:389–395. [PubMed: 17924267]

  • Ravel A, Grieg J, Tinga C, Todd E, Campbell G, Cassidy M, Marshall B, Pollari E. Exploring historical Canadian foodborne outbreak data sets for human illness attribution. Periodical of Food Protection. 2009;72:1963–1976. [PubMed: 19777901]

  • Renter DG, Gnad DP, Sargeant JM, Hygnstrom SE. Prevalence and serovars of Salmonella in the feces of free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Nebraska. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2006;42:699–703. [PubMed: 17092906]

  • Renter DG, Bohaychuk 5, Van Donkersgoed J, Male monarch R. Presence of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in feces from feedlot cattle in Alberta and absenteeism on corresponding beef carcasses. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 2007;71:230–235. [PMC free article: PMC1899871] [PubMed: 17695600]

  • Rimhanen-Finne R, Niskanen T, Hallanvuo South, Makary P, Haukka G, Pajunen S, Siitonen A, Ristolainen R, Pöyry H, Ollgren J, Kuusi K. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis causing a large outbreak associated with carrots in Republic of finland, 2006. Epidemiology & Infection. 2009;137:342–347. [PubMed: 18177523]

  • Rodriguez A, Pangloli P, Richards HA, Mount JR, Draughon FA. Prevalence of Salmonella in diverse environmental subcontract samples. Journal of Food Protection. 2006;69:2576–2580. [PubMed: 17133798]

  • Sagoo SK, Little CL, Mitchell RT. The microbiological test of ready-to-consume organic vegetables from retail establishments. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2001;33:434–439. [PubMed: 11737627]

  • Sagoo SK, Trivial CL, Ward 50, Gillespie IA, Mitchell RT. Microbiological report of ready-to-eat salad vegetables from retail establishments uncovers a national outbreak of Salmonellosis. Journal of Nutrient Protection. 2003;66:403–409. [PubMed: 12636292]

  • Sagoo SK, Trivial CL, Mitchell RT. Microbiological quality of open gear up-to-eat salad vegetables: Effectiveness of food hygiene training of management. Journal of Food Protection. 2003;66:1581–1586. [PubMed: 14503709]

  • Saini R, Halverson LJ, Lorimar JC. Rainfall timing and frequency influence on leaching of Escherichia coli RS2G through soil following manure application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2003;32:1865–1872. [PubMed: 14535331]

  • Salleh NA, Rusul G, Hassan Z, Reezal A, Isa SH, Nishibuchi M, Radu S. Incidence of Salmonella spp. in raw vegetables in Selangor, Malaysia. Nutrient Control. 2003;14:475–479.

  • Sánchez S, Martínez R, García A, Vidal D, Blanco J, Blanco Chiliad, Blanco JE, Mora A, Herrera-León Due south, Echeita A, Alonso JM, Rey J. Detection and label of O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in wild boars. Veterinary Microbiology. 2010;143:420–423. [PubMed: 20005055]

  • Santos FBO, Li X, Payne JB, Sheldon BW. Estimation of most likely number Salmonella populations on commercial Northward Carolina turkey farms. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2005;fourteen:700–708.

  • Sargeant JM, Sanderson MW, Smith RA, Griffin DD. Associations between management, climate, and Escherichia coli O157 in the faeces of feedlot cattle in the Midwestern USA. Preventive Veterinarian Medicine. 2004;66:175–206. [PubMed: 15579343]

  • Scaife Hr, Cowan D, Finney J, Kinghorn-Perry SF, Crook B. Wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) as potential carriers of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli. Veterinarian Tape. 2006;159:175–178. [PubMed: 16891425]

  • Semenov AV, van Overbeek 50, van Bruggen AHC. Percolation and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in soil amended with contaminated dairy manure or slurry. Applied and Ecology Microbiology. 2009;75:3206–3215. [PMC free article: PMC2681632] [PubMed: 19270130]

  • Seo YH, Jang JH, Moon KD. Microbial evaluation of minimally processed vegetables and sprouts produced in Seoul, Korea. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2010;19:1282–1288.

  • Skov MN, Madsen JJ, Rahbek C, Lodal J, Jespersen JB, Jørgensen JC, Dietz HH, Chriél M, Baggesen DL. Transmission of Salmonella between wildlife and meat-production animals in Kingdom of denmark. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2008;105:1558–1568. [PubMed: 19146492]

  • Smith BD, James MR, Millner P, Hashem FM, Cotton wool CP, Marsh LE. Pathogen aerosolization and deposition onto nearby leafy greens through various farm operations. Presented at Human Pathogens on Plants Workshop; College Park, Dr.. Feb 13-fifteen; 2012. Abstract for Poster #14.

  • Sproston EL, Macrae K, Ogden ID, Wilson MJ, Strachan NJC. Slugs: Potential novel vectors of Escherichia coli O157. Practical and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72:144–149. [PMC complimentary article: PMC1352200] [PubMed: 16391036]

  • Stephens TP, McAllister TA, Stanford Grand. Perineal swabs reveal effect of super shedders on the manual of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in commercial feedlots. Journal of Beast Science. 2009;87:4151–4160. [PubMed: 19684276]

  • Talley JL, Wayadande Air conditioning, Wasala LP, Gerry Air conditioning, Fletcher J, DeSilva U, Gilliland SE. Association of Escherichia coli O157:H7 with filth flies captured in leafy light-green fields and experimental transmission of Eastward. coli O157:H7 to spinach leaves past house flies. Journal of Food Protection. 2009;72:1547–1552. [PubMed: 19681284]

  • Thunberg RL, Tran TT, Bennett RW, Matthews RN, Belay N. Microbial evaluation of selected fresh produce obtained at retail markets. Journal of Food Protection. 2002;65:677–682. [PubMed: 11952219]

  • Thurston-Enriquez JA, Watt P, Dowd SE, Enriquez R, Pepper IL, Gerba CP. Detection of protozoan parasites and microsporidia in irrigation waters used for ingather production. Journal of Food Protection. 2002;65:378–382. [PubMed: 11848571]

  • Tserendorj A, Anceno AJ, Houpt ER, Icenhour CR, Sethabutr O, Bricklayer CS, Shipin OV. Molecular techniques in ecohealth inquiry toolkit: Facilitating interpretation of aggregate gastroenteritis brunt in an irrigated periurban landscape. EcoHealth. 2011;8:349–364. [PubMed: 22146856]

  • Turutoglu H, Ozturk D, Guler 50, Pehlivanoglu F. Presence and characteristics of sorbitol-negative Escherichia coli O157 in good for you sheep faeces. Veterinarni Medicina. 2007;52:301–307.

  • Tyrrel SF, Quinton JN. Overland flow transport of pathogens from agronomical state receiving fecal wastes. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2003;94:87S–93S. [PubMed: 12675940]

  • Van Hoorebeke Southward, Van Immerseel F, De Vylder J, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F, de Kruif A, Dewulf J. Faecal sampling underestimates the actual prevalence of Salmonella in laying hen flocks. Zoonoses Public Health. 2009;56:471–476. [PubMed: 19243563]

  • Viswanathan P, Kaur R. Prevalence and growth of pathogens on salad vegetables, fruits, and sprouts. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Wellness. 2001;203:205–213. [PubMed: 11279816]

  • Walker C, Shi 10, Sanderson Thou, Sargeant J, Nagaraja TG. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in gut contents of beefiness cattle at slaughter. Foodborne Pathogens and Affliction. 2010;7:249–255. [PubMed: 19899963]

  • Wang F, Dou Z, Ma W, Zhang F. Challenges and opportunities of animate being waste management in China. Proceedings of 2005 America Animal Waste Direction Symposium; 2005. pp. 704–709.

  • Wasteson Y, Johannessen GS, Bruheim T, Urdahl AM, O'Sullivan Yard, Rørvik LM. Fluctuations in the occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on a Norwegian farm. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2005;xl:373–377. [PubMed: 15836742]

  • Wilkes Chiliad, Border TA, Gannon VPJ, Jokinen C, Lyautey E, Neumann NF, Ruecker N, Scott A, Sunohara M, Topp Due east, Lapen DR. Associations among pathogenic bacteria, parasites, and environmental and land use factors in multiple mixed-employ watersheds. Water Research. 2011;45:5807–5825. [PubMed: 21889781]

  • Williams ML, Pearl DL, LeJeune JT. Multiple-locus variable-nucleotide tandem repeat subtype analysis implicates European starlings as biological vectors for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Ohio, Usa. Periodical of Applied Microbiology. 2011;111:982–988. [PubMed: 21762472]

  • Woerner DR, Ranson JR, Sofos JN, Dewell GA, Smith GC, Salman Md, Belk KE. Determining the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle and beef from the feedlot to the cooler. Journal of Food Protection. 2006;69:2824–2837. [PubMed: 17186645]

4

Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA.

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK114507/

Posted by: martinquier1967.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Are We More Likely To Develop Foodborne Illness From Animal Foods Than Plant Foods?"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel